Source code. &= \mathbb{P} \Big( (n + \chi_{1,\alpha}^2) \theta^2 - (2 n p_n + \chi_{1,\alpha}^2) \theta + n p_n^2 \leqslant 0 \Big) \\[6pt] Score Sheets for Various Fields. &= \mathbb{P} \Bigg( \theta \in \Bigg[ \frac{n p_n + \tfrac{1}{2} \chi_{1,\alpha}^2}{n + \chi_{1,\alpha}^2} \pm \frac{\chi_{1,\alpha}}{n + \chi_{1,\alpha}^2} \cdot \sqrt{n p_n (1-p_n) + \tfrac{1}{4} \chi_{1,\alpha}^2} \Bigg] \Bigg), \\[6pt] Needless to say, different values of P obtain different Binomial distributions: Note that as P becomes closer to zero, the distribution becomes increasingly lop-sided. Suppose we carry out a 5% test. and substitution of the observed sample proportion (for simplicity I will use the same notation for this value) then leads to the Wilson score interval: $$\text{CI}_\theta(1-\alpha) = \Bigg[ \frac{n p_n + \tfrac{1}{2} \chi_{1,\alpha}^2}{n + \chi_{1,\alpha}^2} \pm \frac{\chi_{1,\alpha}}{n + \chi_{1,\alpha}^2} \cdot \sqrt{n p_n (1-p_n) + \tfrac{1}{4} \chi_{1,\alpha}^2} \Bigg].$$. This graph is expressed in terms of the frequency, , of throwing r heads, f(r). We want to calculate confidence intervals around an observed value, p. The first thing to note is that it is incorrect to insert p in place of P in the formula above. Package index. &= \mathbb{P} \Bigg( \bigg( \theta - \frac{n p_n + \tfrac{1}{2} \chi_{1,\alpha}^2}{n + \chi_{1,\alpha}^2} \bigg)^2 \leqslant \frac{\chi_{1,\alpha}^2 (n p_n (1-p_n) + \tfrac{1}{4} \chi_{1,\alpha}^2)}{(n + \chi_{1,\alpha}^2)^2} \Bigg) \\[6pt] stevens funeral home pulaski, va obituaries. As you would expect when substituting a continuous distribution line for a discrete one (series of integer steps), there is some slight disagreement between the two results, marked here as error. or 'runway threshold bar?'. What we need to do is work out how many different ways you could obtain zero heads, 1 head, 2 heads, etc. T-Distribution Table (One Tail and Two-Tails), Multivariate Analysis & Independent Component, Variance and Standard Deviation Calculator, Permutation Calculator / Combination Calculator, The Practically Cheating Calculus Handbook, The Practically Cheating Statistics Handbook, Probable inference, the law of succession, and statistical inference, Confidence Interval Calculation for Binomial Proportions. (\widehat{p} - p_0)^2 \leq c^2 \left[ \frac{p_0(1 - p_0)}{n}\right]. using our definition of \(\widehat{\text{SE}}\) from above. III. All I have to do is check whether \(\theta_0\) lies inside the confidence interval, in which case I fail to reject, or outside, in which case I reject. The Binomial for r = 1.5 (for example) is undefined. The Wilson confidence intervals [1] have better coverage rates for small samples. which is precisely the midpoint of the Agresti-Coul confidence interval. In this case, regardless of sample size and regardless of confidence level, the Wald interval only contains a single point: zero Substituting the definition of \(\widehat{\text{SE}}\) and re-arranging, this is equivalent to It might help here to show you the derivation of the interval in algebraic terms. Need help with a homework or test question? Page 122 talks specifically about subtracting one standard deviation from a proportion for comparison purposes. &= \mathbb{P} \Big( n (p_n^2 - 2 p_n \theta + \theta^2) \leqslant \chi_{1,\alpha}^2 (\theta-\theta^2) \Big) \\[6pt] Follow the below steps to use Excel functions to calculate the T score. Some integral should equal some other integral. To put it another way, we fail to reject \(H_0\) if \(|T_n| \leq 1.96\). And we want to scale the data so that the lowest value equates to 0 and the highest value equates to 1. In contrast, the Wald test is absolutely terrible: its nominal type I error rate is systematically higher than 5% even when \(n\) is not especially small and \(p\) is not especially close to zero or one. So much for Impact Factors! Please Contact Us. Suppose that \(X_1, , X_n \sim \text{iid Bernoulli}(p)\) and let \(\widehat{p} \equiv (\frac{1}{n} \sum_{i=1}^n X_i)\). n\widehat{p}^2 &< c^2(\widehat{p} - \widehat{p}^2)\\ So for what values of \(\mu_0\) will we fail to reject? (n + c^2) p_0^2 - (2n\widehat{p} + c^2) p_0 + n\widehat{p}^2 = 0. Wilson intervals get their assymetry from the underlying likelihood function for the binomial, which is used to compute the "expected standard error" and "score" (i.e., first derivative of the likelihood function) under the null hypotheisis. GET the Statistics & Calculus Bundle at a 40% discount! PDF. For the Wilson score interval we first square the pivotal quantity to get: $$n \cdot \frac{(p_n-\theta)^2}{\theta(1-\theta)} \overset{\text{Approx}}{\sim} \text{ChiSq}(1).$$. To make a long story short, the Wilson interval gives a much more reasonable description of our uncertainty about \(p\) for any sample size. Pr(1 P)(n-r). But they are not solely used for this areas. Wilson points out that the correct solution involves an inversion of the formula above. Indeed, compared to the score test, the Wald test is a disaster, as Ill now show. \], \(\widetilde{p} - \widetilde{\text{SE}} < 0\), \[ 516. p_0 &= \frac{1}{2\left(n + \frac{n c^2}{n}\right)}\left\{\left(2n\widehat{p} + \frac{2n c^2}{2n}\right) \pm \sqrt{4 n^2c^2 \left[\frac{\widehat{p}(1 - \widehat{p})}{n}\right] + 4n^2c^2\left[\frac{c^2}{4n^2}\right] }\right\} \\ \\ All I have to do is collect the values of \(\theta_0\) that are not rejected. The right-hand side of the preceding inequality is a quadratic function of \(\widehat{p}\) that opens upwards. Wilson CI (also called plus-4 confidence intervals or Wilson Score Intervals) are Wald intervals computed from data formed by adding 2 successes and 2 failures. Explanation for the Wilson Score Interval? The score test isnt perfect: if \(p\) is extremely close to zero or one, its actual type I error rate can be appreciably higher than its nominal type I error rate: as much as 10% compared to 5% when \(n = 25\). If you feel that weve factorized too many quadratic equations already, you have my express permission to skip ahead. Which makes things fair. Because the Wald test is equivalent to checking whether \(p_0\) lies inside the Wald confidence interval, it inherits all of the latters defects. \\ \\ Find the 95% confidence interval for the cure rate. Here's a Painless script that implements the Wilson score for a 5-star rating system. \left(\widehat{p} + \frac{c^2}{2n}\right) - \frac{1}{\omega} > c \sqrt{\widehat{\text{SE}}^2 + \frac{c^2}{4n^2}}. Under these assumptions, the sample mean \(\bar{X}_n \equiv \left(\frac{1}{n} \sum_{i=1}^n X_i\right)\) follows a \(N(\mu, \sigma^2/n)\) distribution. Why is sending so few tanks Ukraine considered significant? Change). To do so, multiply the weight for each criterion by its score and add them up. Calculate Wilson score for your agents. Sheet2 will auto sort as scores are returned in any round, in any order. In the following section, we will explain the steps with 4 different examples. [6] RDocumentation. You can use a score sheet to record scores during the game event. \] By clicking Accept all cookies, you agree Stack Exchange can store cookies on your device and disclose information in accordance with our Cookie Policy. by the definition of \(\widehat{\text{SE}}\). You can see that if there are only positive ratings, the average rating is 100% (because there's a 95% chance it'll end up at 100% or above). This will complete the classical trinity of tests for maximum likelihood estimation: Wald, Score (Lagrange Multiplier), and Likelihood Ratio. Your first 30 minutes with a Chegg tutor is free! The script normalizes the scaled rating system to a 0.0 - 1.0 scale as required by the algorithm. p_0 &= \left( \frac{n}{n + c^2}\right)\left\{\left(\widehat{p} + \frac{c^2}{2n}\right) \pm c\sqrt{ \widehat{\text{SE}}^2 + \frac{c^2}{4n^2} }\right\}\\ \\ doi:10.1080/01621459.1927.10502953. Wilson score interval calculator. Expanding, subtracting \(c^4\) from both sides, and dividing through by \(4n\) gives Steps: First, you have to calculate the P value of the paired sample datasets. For any confidence level $1-\alpha$ we then have the probability interval: $$\begin{align} \end{align} \] Step 2 Using the total points from Step 1, determine the 10-year CVD risk. This tells us that the values of \(\mu_0\) we will fail to reject are precisely those that lie in the interval \(\bar{X} \pm 1.96 \times \sigma/\sqrt{n}\). \[ You can find the z-score for any value in a given distribution if you know the overall mean and standard deviation of the distribution. Multiplying both sides of the inequality by \(n\), expanding, and re-arranging leaves us with a quadratic inequality in \(p_0\), namely You can write a Painless script to perform custom calculations in Elasticsearch. The result is the Wilson Score confidence interval for a proportion: (5) 1 4 2 2 / 2 2 2 / 2 / 2 2 / 2 n z n z n pq z n z p p + + + = Re: Auto sort golf tournament spreadsheet. In fact, there are other approaches that generally yield more accurate results, especially for smaller samples. What is the chance of getting zero heads (or two tails, i.e. A population proportion necessarily lies in the interval \([0,1]\), so it would make sense that any confidence interval for \(p\) should as well. I would encourage people to read the paper, not just the excerpt! To calculate the z-score, we use the formula given below: Z = (x-) / . Confidence Interval Calculation for Binomial Proportions. \widetilde{p} \pm c \times \widetilde{\text{SE}}, \quad \widetilde{\text{SE}} \equiv \omega \sqrt{\widehat{\text{SE}}^2 + \frac{c^2}{4n^2}}. Issues. Since the sample sizes are equal, the value of the test statistic W = the smaller of R1 and R2, which for this example means that W = 119.5 (cell H10). &= \omega \widehat{p} + (1 - \omega) \frac{1}{2} \end{align} \[ \frac{\bar{X}_n - \mu}{\sigma/\sqrt{n}} \sim N(0,1).\] This is equivalent to The HR and MAP at 1 min after intubation were lowest in group S (76.4 9.2 beats/min and 12.9 1.1 kPa), followed by group G (79.9 9.3 beats/min and 13.0 0.9 kPa) and then group D (90.4 . Putting these two results together, the Wald interval lies within \([0,1]\) if and only if \((1 - \omega) < \widehat{p} < \omega\). \[ Letter of recommendation contains wrong name of journal, how will this hurt my application? The lower confidence limit of the Wald interval is negative if and only if \(\widehat{p} < c \times \widehat{\text{SE}}\). Then an interval constructed in this way will cover \(p_0\) precisely when the score test does not reject \(H_0\colon p = p_0\). While the Wilson interval may look somewhat strange, theres actually some very simple intuition behind it. By the quadratic formula, these roots are 1.2 Find mean and standard deviation for dataset. &= \mathbb{P} \Bigg( \theta^2 - 2 \cdot\frac{n p_n + \tfrac{1}{2} \chi_{1,\alpha}^2}{n + \chi_{1,\alpha}^2} \cdot \theta + \frac{n p_n^2}{n + \chi_{1,\alpha}^2} \leqslant 0 \Bigg) \\[6pt] Why is 51.8 inclination standard for Soyuz? \widehat{p} \pm c \sqrt{\widehat{p}(1 - \widehat{p})/n} = 0 \pm c \times \sqrt{0(1 - 0)/n} = \{0 \}. This has been a post of epic proportions, pun very much intended. \begin{align*} \], \(\widehat{\text{SE}}^2 = \widehat{p}(1 - \widehat{p})/n\), \(\widehat{p} \pm c \times \widehat{\text{SE}}\), \[ Is a normal distribution a distribution of one random variable or of multiple random variables? \] \[ As you can see, solving the quadratic inequality in the probability interval leads to an interval that respects the true space of possible values of the proportion parameter (i.e., it is between zero and one). Wilson, E.B. This procedure is called inverting a test. Compared to the Wald interval, this is quite reasonable. See the figure above.
What Does Ga1 Mean For Concerts,
Continuous Learning Self Appraisal Comments Examples,
Basque Physical Traits,
Kevin Carroll Obituary,
What Happened To Mike Galley On Engine Power,
Articles W
Latest Posts
by wilson score excel
Source code. &= \mathbb{P} \Big( (n + \chi_{1,\alpha}^2) \theta^2 - (2 n p_n + \chi_{1,\alpha}^2) \theta + n p_n^2 \leqslant 0 \Big) \\[6pt] Score Sheets for Various Fields. &= \mathbb{P} \Bigg( \theta \in \Bigg[ \frac{n p_n + \tfrac{1}{2} \chi_{1,\alpha}^2}{n + \chi_{1,\alpha}^2} \pm \frac{\chi_{1,\alpha}}{n + \chi_{1,\alpha}^2} \cdot \sqrt{n p_n (1-p_n) + \tfrac{1}{4} \chi_{1,\alpha}^2} \Bigg] \Bigg), \\[6pt] Needless to say, different values of P obtain different Binomial distributions: Note that as P becomes closer to zero, the distribution becomes increasingly lop-sided. Suppose we carry out a 5% test. and substitution of the observed sample proportion (for simplicity I will use the same notation for this value) then leads to the Wilson score interval: $$\text{CI}_\theta(1-\alpha) = \Bigg[ \frac{n p_n + \tfrac{1}{2} \chi_{1,\alpha}^2}{n + \chi_{1,\alpha}^2} \pm \frac{\chi_{1,\alpha}}{n + \chi_{1,\alpha}^2} \cdot \sqrt{n p_n (1-p_n) + \tfrac{1}{4} \chi_{1,\alpha}^2} \Bigg].$$. This graph is expressed in terms of the frequency, , of throwing r heads, f(r). We want to calculate confidence intervals around an observed value, p. The first thing to note is that it is incorrect to insert p in place of P in the formula above. Package index. &= \mathbb{P} \Bigg( \bigg( \theta - \frac{n p_n + \tfrac{1}{2} \chi_{1,\alpha}^2}{n + \chi_{1,\alpha}^2} \bigg)^2 \leqslant \frac{\chi_{1,\alpha}^2 (n p_n (1-p_n) + \tfrac{1}{4} \chi_{1,\alpha}^2)}{(n + \chi_{1,\alpha}^2)^2} \Bigg) \\[6pt] stevens funeral home pulaski, va obituaries. As you would expect when substituting a continuous distribution line for a discrete one (series of integer steps), there is some slight disagreement between the two results, marked here as error. or 'runway threshold bar?'. What we need to do is work out how many different ways you could obtain zero heads, 1 head, 2 heads, etc. T-Distribution Table (One Tail and Two-Tails), Multivariate Analysis & Independent Component, Variance and Standard Deviation Calculator, Permutation Calculator / Combination Calculator, The Practically Cheating Calculus Handbook, The Practically Cheating Statistics Handbook, Probable inference, the law of succession, and statistical inference, Confidence Interval Calculation for Binomial Proportions. (\widehat{p} - p_0)^2 \leq c^2 \left[ \frac{p_0(1 - p_0)}{n}\right]. using our definition of \(\widehat{\text{SE}}\) from above. III. All I have to do is check whether \(\theta_0\) lies inside the confidence interval, in which case I fail to reject, or outside, in which case I reject. The Binomial for r = 1.5 (for example) is undefined. The Wilson confidence intervals [1] have better coverage rates for small samples. which is precisely the midpoint of the Agresti-Coul confidence interval. In this case, regardless of sample size and regardless of confidence level, the Wald interval only contains a single point: zero Substituting the definition of \(\widehat{\text{SE}}\) and re-arranging, this is equivalent to It might help here to show you the derivation of the interval in algebraic terms. Need help with a homework or test question? Page 122 talks specifically about subtracting one standard deviation from a proportion for comparison purposes. &= \mathbb{P} \Big( n (p_n^2 - 2 p_n \theta + \theta^2) \leqslant \chi_{1,\alpha}^2 (\theta-\theta^2) \Big) \\[6pt] Follow the below steps to use Excel functions to calculate the T score. Some integral should equal some other integral. To put it another way, we fail to reject \(H_0\) if \(|T_n| \leq 1.96\). And we want to scale the data so that the lowest value equates to 0 and the highest value equates to 1. In contrast, the Wald test is absolutely terrible: its nominal type I error rate is systematically higher than 5% even when \(n\) is not especially small and \(p\) is not especially close to zero or one. So much for Impact Factors! Please Contact Us. Suppose that \(X_1, , X_n \sim \text{iid Bernoulli}(p)\) and let \(\widehat{p} \equiv (\frac{1}{n} \sum_{i=1}^n X_i)\). n\widehat{p}^2 &< c^2(\widehat{p} - \widehat{p}^2)\\ So for what values of \(\mu_0\) will we fail to reject? (n + c^2) p_0^2 - (2n\widehat{p} + c^2) p_0 + n\widehat{p}^2 = 0. Wilson intervals get their assymetry from the underlying likelihood function for the binomial, which is used to compute the "expected standard error" and "score" (i.e., first derivative of the likelihood function) under the null hypotheisis. GET the Statistics & Calculus Bundle at a 40% discount! PDF. For the Wilson score interval we first square the pivotal quantity to get: $$n \cdot \frac{(p_n-\theta)^2}{\theta(1-\theta)} \overset{\text{Approx}}{\sim} \text{ChiSq}(1).$$. To make a long story short, the Wilson interval gives a much more reasonable description of our uncertainty about \(p\) for any sample size. Pr(1 P)(n-r). But they are not solely used for this areas. Wilson points out that the correct solution involves an inversion of the formula above. Indeed, compared to the score test, the Wald test is a disaster, as Ill now show. \], \(\widetilde{p} - \widetilde{\text{SE}} < 0\), \[ 516. p_0 &= \frac{1}{2\left(n + \frac{n c^2}{n}\right)}\left\{\left(2n\widehat{p} + \frac{2n c^2}{2n}\right) \pm \sqrt{4 n^2c^2 \left[\frac{\widehat{p}(1 - \widehat{p})}{n}\right] + 4n^2c^2\left[\frac{c^2}{4n^2}\right] }\right\} \\ \\ All I have to do is collect the values of \(\theta_0\) that are not rejected. The right-hand side of the preceding inequality is a quadratic function of \(\widehat{p}\) that opens upwards. Wilson CI (also called plus-4 confidence intervals or Wilson Score Intervals) are Wald intervals computed from data formed by adding 2 successes and 2 failures. Explanation for the Wilson Score Interval? The score test isnt perfect: if \(p\) is extremely close to zero or one, its actual type I error rate can be appreciably higher than its nominal type I error rate: as much as 10% compared to 5% when \(n = 25\). If you feel that weve factorized too many quadratic equations already, you have my express permission to skip ahead. Which makes things fair. Because the Wald test is equivalent to checking whether \(p_0\) lies inside the Wald confidence interval, it inherits all of the latters defects. \\ \\ Find the 95% confidence interval for the cure rate. Here's a Painless script that implements the Wilson score for a 5-star rating system. \left(\widehat{p} + \frac{c^2}{2n}\right) - \frac{1}{\omega} > c \sqrt{\widehat{\text{SE}}^2 + \frac{c^2}{4n^2}}. Under these assumptions, the sample mean \(\bar{X}_n \equiv \left(\frac{1}{n} \sum_{i=1}^n X_i\right)\) follows a \(N(\mu, \sigma^2/n)\) distribution. Why is sending so few tanks Ukraine considered significant? Change). To do so, multiply the weight for each criterion by its score and add them up. Calculate Wilson score for your agents. Sheet2 will auto sort as scores are returned in any round, in any order. In the following section, we will explain the steps with 4 different examples. [6] RDocumentation. You can use a score sheet to record scores during the game event. \] By clicking Accept all cookies, you agree Stack Exchange can store cookies on your device and disclose information in accordance with our Cookie Policy. by the definition of \(\widehat{\text{SE}}\). You can see that if there are only positive ratings, the average rating is 100% (because there's a 95% chance it'll end up at 100% or above). This will complete the classical trinity of tests for maximum likelihood estimation: Wald, Score (Lagrange Multiplier), and Likelihood Ratio. Your first 30 minutes with a Chegg tutor is free! The script normalizes the scaled rating system to a 0.0 - 1.0 scale as required by the algorithm. p_0 &= \left( \frac{n}{n + c^2}\right)\left\{\left(\widehat{p} + \frac{c^2}{2n}\right) \pm c\sqrt{ \widehat{\text{SE}}^2 + \frac{c^2}{4n^2} }\right\}\\ \\ doi:10.1080/01621459.1927.10502953. Wilson score interval calculator. Expanding, subtracting \(c^4\) from both sides, and dividing through by \(4n\) gives Steps: First, you have to calculate the P value of the paired sample datasets. For any confidence level $1-\alpha$ we then have the probability interval: $$\begin{align} \end{align} \] Step 2 Using the total points from Step 1, determine the 10-year CVD risk. This tells us that the values of \(\mu_0\) we will fail to reject are precisely those that lie in the interval \(\bar{X} \pm 1.96 \times \sigma/\sqrt{n}\). \[ You can find the z-score for any value in a given distribution if you know the overall mean and standard deviation of the distribution. Multiplying both sides of the inequality by \(n\), expanding, and re-arranging leaves us with a quadratic inequality in \(p_0\), namely You can write a Painless script to perform custom calculations in Elasticsearch. The result is the Wilson Score confidence interval for a proportion: (5) 1 4 2 2 / 2 2 2 / 2 / 2 2 / 2 n z n z n pq z n z p p + + + = Re: Auto sort golf tournament spreadsheet. In fact, there are other approaches that generally yield more accurate results, especially for smaller samples. What is the chance of getting zero heads (or two tails, i.e. A population proportion necessarily lies in the interval \([0,1]\), so it would make sense that any confidence interval for \(p\) should as well. I would encourage people to read the paper, not just the excerpt! To calculate the z-score, we use the formula given below: Z = (x-) / . Confidence Interval Calculation for Binomial Proportions. \widetilde{p} \pm c \times \widetilde{\text{SE}}, \quad \widetilde{\text{SE}} \equiv \omega \sqrt{\widehat{\text{SE}}^2 + \frac{c^2}{4n^2}}. Issues. Since the sample sizes are equal, the value of the test statistic W = the smaller of R1 and R2, which for this example means that W = 119.5 (cell H10). &= \omega \widehat{p} + (1 - \omega) \frac{1}{2} \end{align} \[ \frac{\bar{X}_n - \mu}{\sigma/\sqrt{n}} \sim N(0,1).\] This is equivalent to The HR and MAP at 1 min after intubation were lowest in group S (76.4 9.2 beats/min and 12.9 1.1 kPa), followed by group G (79.9 9.3 beats/min and 13.0 0.9 kPa) and then group D (90.4 . Putting these two results together, the Wald interval lies within \([0,1]\) if and only if \((1 - \omega) < \widehat{p} < \omega\). \[ Letter of recommendation contains wrong name of journal, how will this hurt my application? The lower confidence limit of the Wald interval is negative if and only if \(\widehat{p} < c \times \widehat{\text{SE}}\). Then an interval constructed in this way will cover \(p_0\) precisely when the score test does not reject \(H_0\colon p = p_0\). While the Wilson interval may look somewhat strange, theres actually some very simple intuition behind it. By the quadratic formula, these roots are 1.2 Find mean and standard deviation for dataset. &= \mathbb{P} \Bigg( \theta^2 - 2 \cdot\frac{n p_n + \tfrac{1}{2} \chi_{1,\alpha}^2}{n + \chi_{1,\alpha}^2} \cdot \theta + \frac{n p_n^2}{n + \chi_{1,\alpha}^2} \leqslant 0 \Bigg) \\[6pt] Why is 51.8 inclination standard for Soyuz? \widehat{p} \pm c \sqrt{\widehat{p}(1 - \widehat{p})/n} = 0 \pm c \times \sqrt{0(1 - 0)/n} = \{0 \}. This has been a post of epic proportions, pun very much intended. \begin{align*} \], \(\widehat{\text{SE}}^2 = \widehat{p}(1 - \widehat{p})/n\), \(\widehat{p} \pm c \times \widehat{\text{SE}}\), \[ Is a normal distribution a distribution of one random variable or of multiple random variables? \] \[ As you can see, solving the quadratic inequality in the probability interval leads to an interval that respects the true space of possible values of the proportion parameter (i.e., it is between zero and one). Wilson, E.B. This procedure is called inverting a test. Compared to the Wald interval, this is quite reasonable. See the figure above.
What Does Ga1 Mean For Concerts,
Continuous Learning Self Appraisal Comments Examples,
Basque Physical Traits,
Kevin Carroll Obituary,
What Happened To Mike Galley On Engine Power,
Articles W
by hsf-adminHughes Fields and Stoby Celebrates 50 Years!!
Come Celebrate our Journey of 50 years of serving all people and from all walks of life through our pictures of our celebration extravaganza!...
by hsf-adminHistoric Ruling on Indigenous People’s Land Rights.
Van Mendelson Vs. Attorney General Guyana On Friday the 16th December 2022 the Chief Justice Madame Justice Roxanne George handed down an historic judgment...