san francisco superior court law and motion

by

san francisco superior court law and motion

) 9 KIM SENG TANG, ) Department: 404 Instead they must show a compelling and opposing state interest. Hinshaw, Winkler, Draa, Marsh & Still v. Superior Court (1996) 51 Cal.App.4th 233, 239 [disapproved on other grounds by Williams v. Sup. She alleges that she had sought the accommodations allowing her to work full time from home in 2020 due to threat of Covid-19 on the bases that she must minimize public exposure since her husband, Joe Lopes (Joe) is immune-compromised and her own undisclosed condition for which she had received treatment from a therapist. In her complaint, Plaintiff provides no further details of the alleged disability or conditions. 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER DISSOLUTION OF MARRIAGE ONL 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO ) 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM Last. Civic Center Courthouse 9 JOSE LUIS MARTINEZ, ) Department: 404 6 JANE KAWASAKI, ) Case Number: FDI-14-782099 [G]iven the private nature of a confidential settlement of a lawsuit, the burden rests on the proponents of discovery of this information to justify compelling production of this material. 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 12, 2023 (415) 551-3750, Judge Susan M. Breall 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM ) ) (Laird) obtained medical history and information from Plaintiff, learned of the various symptoms, and took his blood pressure, but then told Plaintiff merely to go home, relax, and eat some food without conducting any further test or examination. **Attorneys are only licensed to practice law in California. 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM But this is a legal impossibility: a defendant has onlyoneduty, measured byonestandard of care, under any given circumstances. (Ibid. ) ) 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 10, 2023 ) CCP 2031.240(c)(1). 9 JAMES M. BATARA SEVERSON, ) Department: 403 Therefore, it lies only where the defects appear on the face of the pleading or are judicially noticed. (SKF Farms v. Superior Court (1984) 153 Cal.App.3d 902, 905.) 11 ) 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM 10 Respondent ) Presiding: MARIA EVANGELISTA ) 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER RE: LEAVE TO FILE AMENDED PETI 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO Generally, supplemental demands to interrogatories may be served twice prior to trial setting, and once after the initial setting of a trial date, requesting that the prior answers to interrogatories be updated and affirmed. Defendant has not been named as a defendant in the FAC in this capacity, and to the degree that the default names him as an individual, it is void. 10 COLETTE WHORISKEY, ) Department: 404 Untimely responses to discovery requests waive all objections. ) 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT 10 Respondent ) Presiding: DANIEL FLORES 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM Before filing a demurrer, the demurring or moving party is required to meet and confer with the party who filed the pleading demurred to for the purposes of determining whether an agreement can be reached through a filing of an amended pleading that would resolve the objections to be raised in the demurrer. As a result, Defendants willfully, knowingly, and with a conscious disregard for the safety of others, undertook the tortious conduct. 9 WARREN W. PRINGLE III, ) Department: 403 11 ) ) As the default is void for lack of jurisdiction over the Defendant in his individual capacity, the default does bear correcting and Defendant is entitled to his relief to that limited degree. 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM Quality Assurance v. Gherardini (1979) 93 Cal.App.3d 669, 679. Department 403 5 5 10 Respondent ) Presiding: DANIEL FLORES Although some have a specific court department for hearing petitions for writ of administrative mandamus, in many courts these cases can be assigned to any judge. 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: December 22, 2022 The pages of a memorandum must be numbered consecutively beginning with the first page and using only Arabic numerals (e.g., 1, 2, 3). Phone: 415-705-1033 ANNOUNCEMENT OF EMERGENCY FAMILY COURT OPERATIONS, EFFECTIVE MARCH 24, 2020, COVID-19 Modifying Child Support Information, JudgeMonica F. Wiley, Supervising Judge Code 452(d).) Department 425 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM ) Rodriguez v. Brill(2015) 234 Cal.App.4th 715, 729. ) ) ) 13 TENTATIVE RULING 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM The court may construe the absence of a memorandum as an admission that the motion or special demurrer is not meritorious and cause for its denial and, in the case of a demurrer, as a waiver of all grounds not supported. Generally, supplemental demands to RPODs may be served twice prior to trial setting, and once after the initial setting of a trial date, requesting that the prior production be updated and affirmed. 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 17, 2023 10 Respondent ) Presiding: DANIEL FLORES ) Food 4 Less Supermarkets, Inc. v. Superior Court(1995) 40 Cal.App.4th 651, 657. Choosing the right courtroom and courthouse for any case, including a petition for writ of administrative mandamus, can be critical to the success of the petition. 6 JACQUELINE M SCHLIFKE, ) Case Number: FDI-15-783643 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM 10 Respondent ) Presiding: DANIEL FLORES 12 OTHER REVIEW HEARING 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 17, 2023 11 ) 6 TAHIRAH WOODARD, ) Case Number: FDV-21-815836 ) ) **This is the end of the Tentative Rulings. An ex parte application for an order must be accompanied by an affidavit or a declaration showing: (1) that the applicant informed the opposing party when and where the application would be made no later than 10:00 a.m. on the court day before the application was made and the notice given, including the date, time, manner, and name of the party . ) CCP 395.5. However, timely unverified responses containing both objections and answers may serve to maintain objections. Clickherefor more information about tentative rulings. 12 ) The matter went unresolved and Plaintiff filed a motion to compel further responses on June 30, 2021. 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 5, 2023 ) The Court is predominantly seeking attorneys interested in assisting incarcerated individuals with their civil actions. A tentative ruling is a preliminary ruling that states how a court intends to rule on a motion, and courts may modify or reverse civil tentative rulings prior to issuing final rulings, hence the term tentative.. ) ) 10 Respondent ) Presiding: DANIEL FLORES PLEASE NOTE:The Courts Official Court Reporters are not available within the meaning of California Rules of Court, Rule 2.956, for court reporting of civil cases. ) 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER FOR CHANGE OF CHA 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO ) Further, he alleges that Defendants outrageous and prejudicial conduct was a direct and proximate cause of his alleged emotional distress. 5 Effective September 6, 2021, unless the court otherwise orders, participants may attend their hearing remotely. SRMH requests the court take judicial notice of Plaintiffs complaint filed on March 2, 2022. ) 6 JOHN FRANCIS DYNIA, ) Case Number: FDI-20-794180 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM Plaintiff moves to compel responses to their supplemental RPODs and FIs served in March of 2022. A motion to strike may attack any irrelevant, false, or improper matter in any pleading, or to strike a pleading that is not drawn or filed in conformity with the laws of this state. (CCP 436.) 10 Respondent ) Presiding: DANIEL FLORES 11 ) ) Local Rule 8 governs the procedures for petitions for writ of administrative mandamus. 9 ADAM SCHLIFKE, ) Department: 404 5 It is clear that UPA has failed to serve timely responses, and therefore Plaintiffs are entitled to sanctions. 10 Respondent ) Presiding: MARIA EVANGELISTA The largest division in the San Francisco Superior Court, the Civil Division conducts civil trials and manages civil filings, records, small claims cases, appeals, probate matters, unlawful detainers, defaults, case management, dispute resolution, name changes, and civil restraining orders to prevent harassment and elder abuse. ) 11 ) 10 Respondent ) Presiding: MARIA EVANGELISTA Filter by a specific county without spaces. Court Clerk ) 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM (Civil Case Coordination) 455 Golden Gate Avenue, 5th Floor. 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT ) 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 10, 2023 10 Respondent ) Presiding: MARJORIE SLABACH ) ) Medical information regarding Joes condition and Plaintiffs need for accommodation to account for it is clearly relevant, even directly relevant, to this litigation. ) Non-discovery Law and Motion Matters. ) 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT 96, llc vs. atique rehman, et al. Dawes v. Superior Court(1980) 111 Cal.App.3d 82, 89-90 (Dawes). 5 For information on how virtual appearances may be made, please refer to the Civil Independent Calendar Hearings link. 8 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 3, 2023 9 EVGENY FOUKSMAN, ) Department: 403 6 ULIANA POPOV, ) Case Number: FDI-20-793286 If a proposed order or judgment is submitted, it must be lodged and served with the moving papers but must not be attached to them. 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT ) Effective Monday, July 19, 2021, all persons entering any court facility will be required to properly wear a face covering over their nose and mouth, regardless of their vaccination status. 6 NAOMI ASSARAF, ) Case Number: FDI-19-792611 9 MOHAMMAD DAGHIGHI, ) Department: 404 ) ) ) 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM ) ) Based on the foregoing, motion is DENIED. 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM Reputation. Court Reporter Information The court is no longer providing a court reporter in the Law & Motion Department. ) 10 Respondent ) Presiding: MARIA EVANGELISTA 10 (Subd (c) amended effective January 1, 2007; previously amended effective July 1, 1984, January 1, 1992, and January 1, 2004.). 6 SARAH GADYE, ) Case Number: FDI-16-785621 See below for additional requirements for unlawful detainers and other civil cases. 10 Respondent ) Presiding: MARIA EVANGELISTA 11 ) The Court usually issues tentative rulings two days before most law and motion matters. A judge may require that a copy of that case must be lodged. Civ. 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT ) California Code of Civil Procedure Sections 1167.5, 1170.7, 1170.8, and other statutes set shorter notice periods for some motions in unlawful detainer cases. 5 SFPKOA has made no showing that this matter is properly under the mandatory relief provisions of CCP 473(b). 13 TENTATIVE R 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO ) ) 9 MAINAK BANERJEE, ) Department: 403 ) CCP 412.20(a) states in relevant part that a summons must be directed to the defendant. ) ) The motion is GRANTED with leave to amend. 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT All limited and unlimited jurisdiction matters are heard in Department 302 at 9:30 a.m. Monday through Friday. The Court finds that a total of three hours across two motions at the reasonable rate of $495/hr is appropriate, plus $60 of filing fees per motion are all reasonable. 11 ) If a party timely brings such a motion, the court must transfer the action if it finds that the court is not a proper court. 13 TENTATIVE RULING The largest division in the San Francisco Superior Court, the Civil Division conducts civil trials and manages civil filings, records, small claims cases, appeals, probate matters, unlawful detainers, defaults, case management, dispute resolution, name changes, and civil restraining orders to prevent harassment and elder abuse. 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER FOR CHANGE OF CHILD CUSTO 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO ) 9 KAILIN WANG, ) Department: 404 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 3, 2023 6 SARAH POOLE, ) Case Number: FDV-22-816259 ) ) ) ) 5 ) Law and motion and ex parte applications in a direct calendar case are heard in the department to which the case was assigned. ) 12 OTHER REVIEW HEARING; ORDER TO SHOW CAU 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO The Motion is DENIED. ) ) SCV-270126, Lopes v. Petaluma City School District. 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: December 29, 2022 10 Respondent ) Presiding: DANIEL FLORES ) 6 CHRISTOPHER JAMES RIVERS, ) Case Number: FMS-17-387056 These facts do not rise to the previously upheld bases for punitive damages in cases of intoxicated driving. Conduct falling below the standard of care does not constitute excusable neglect as required under the discretionary portion of CCP 473(b). 6 HILL M PASHALIDES, ) Case Number: FDI-20-793829 ) While Plaintiff alleges outrageous and prejudicial conduct, he fails to allege extreme conduct by SRMH, which is an essential element of the cause of action. 9 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM San Francisco Superior Court conducting settlement conferences for the civil and unlawful detainer calendars (2007 - 2011) and hearing discovery motions (2012 - 2014). ) Court Clerk ) Defendant points out on reply that Plaintiffs opposition was late. ) ) ) Oscar Pardo has recused self from this case. 11 ) 10 Respondent ) Presiding: MARIA EVANGELISTA (415) 551-3962, Civic Center Courthouse Also, Sacramento County Superior Court judges are routinely asked to enter judgments challenging actions by the State of California and its agencies. ) Given that petition was filed in Fresno Superior Court, all subsequent CAA petitions to determine any subsequent petition involving the same agreement to arbitrate and the same controversy belong in that court. 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 5, 2023 These may include: Whether there was any previous continuance, extension of time, or delay of trial due to any party; The availability . 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM (Ibid.). 11 ) Plaintiffs have not placed adequate information before the Court for there to be a finding of waiver. ) ) ) 10 Respondent ) Presiding: MARJORIE SLABACH 5 For Case Management Conferences, Law and Motion hearings, and Ex Parte hearings, parties may appear remotely pursuant to Civil Code of Procedure section 367.75 and California Rule of Court, rule 3.672. . 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT See Cal Rule of Court, Rule 3.1300 (d). Local Rules of Court Effective January 1, 2023, 2023 Superior Court of California - County of San Francisco, Caf at Civic Center Courthouse - Starchef, Information Regarding Coronavirus and Court Operations, Local Rules of Court Effective July 1, 2022, Local Rules of Court Effective May 10, 2022, Local Rules of Court Effective April 1, 2022, Local Rules of Court Effective January 1, 2022, Local Rules of CourtEffective July1, 2021, Local Rules of CourtEffective January 1, 2021, Local Rules of Court Effective July 1, 2020, Local Rules of Court Effective January 1, 2020. 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM 11 ) 11 ) ) ) SRMH shall prepare and serve a proposed order consistent with this tentative ruling within five days of the date set for argument of this matter. Read San Francisco Bay Guardian v. Superior Court, 17 Cal.App.4th 655, see flags on bad law, and search Casetext's comprehensive legal database . 10 Respondent ) Presiding: MARIA EVANGELISTA In reviewing all of the bases for transferring the matter to Fresno County, one appears dispositive. ) (1979) 99 Cal.App.3d 283, 288. 5 Find electronic and print forms for court and sample legal agreements at the San Francisco Law Library. The Court heard the Plaintiffs motion for further responses on September 3, 2021. 6 DIANA AI HUANG, ) Case Number: FDI-22-796207 9:11-13.) Mandatory relief is only proper where default or dismissal has been entered as a result of the acts or omissions of the attorney. Writs of Administrative Mandamus in Other Superior Courts. 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 12, 2023 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM The motion is largely, and fatally, defective in presenting the portions of the complaint which SRMH asks the court to strike. 6 JENNIFER SANDELIN, ) Case Number: FDV-15-811822 6 RACHAEL LOHREY, ) Case Number: FMS-21-387368 Please wait a moment while we load this page. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. 11 ) 9 JIAYING HE, ) Department: 403 9 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM ) If a party fails to appear at a law and motion hearing without having given notice, the court may take the matter off calendar, to be reset only upon motion, or may rule on the matter. Rule of Court, Rule 8.54 is inapplicable, as it is a rule applying to appellate matters. 11 ) ) CCP . Therefore, based on all the reasons above, the motion to set aside sanctions orders is DENIED. 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER RE: SPOUSAL OR 1 11 ) ) ) 6 ROMISEH PAKZADIAN, ) Case Number: FDI-11-774399 The purpose of monetary sanctions is to mitigate the effects of the necessity of discovery motions and responses on the prevailing party. 10 Respondent ) Presiding: DANIEL FLORES 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT ) ) Thedemurreris therefore SUSTAINED with leave to amend as to the fifthcauseofaction. ) 100 ) The Court particularly noted that Ms. Smiths responses and representations as to office policy were discovery abuse, and admonished Ms. Smith on the record. 11 Respondent ) Presiding: DANIEL FLORES 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT (CCP 437.) CCP 2030.300(c) (relating to interrogatories), and CCP 2031.310(c) (relating to requests for production of documents) each provide that a monetary sanction shall be imposed against the party losing a motion to compel further responses unless the court finds substantial justification for that partys position or other circumstances making sanctions unjust. The purpose of monetary sanctions is to mitigate the effects of the necessity of discovery motions and responses on the prevailing party. With this limitation, the court GRANTS the requests for judicial notice. The court may, upon any terms as may be just, relieve a party or his or her legal representative from a judgment, dismissal, order, or other proceeding taken against him or her through his or her mistake, inadvertence, surprise, or excusable neglect. Events. Opposing counsel shall inform the preparing counsel of objections as to form, if any, or whether the form of order is approved, within five days of receipt of the proposed order. Britt, supra, 20 Cal.3d 859-862. ) Rule 3.1113 amended effective January 1, 2017; adopted as rule 313 effective January 1, 1984; previously amended and renumbered as rule 3.1113 effective January 1, 2007; previously amended effective July 1, 1984, January 1, 1992, July 1, 1997, July 1, 2000, January 1, 2003, January 1, 2004, January 1, 2008, July 1, 2011, and January 1, 2016. 11 ) You may also call or email the department. ) ) CCP 396b(a), 397(a). 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 10, 2023 ) Plaintiff shall submit a written order to the Court consistent with this tentative ruling and in compliance with Rule of Court 3.1312(a) and (b). (2) San Francisco Immigration Court: Address: 630 Sansome Street, 4th Floor, Room 475 San Francisco, CA 94111. ) The Motion is GRANTED. ) ) Please see Google Maps for a map and directions to the immigration court. 5 ) File the original motion and proof of service with the court. If in paper form, the copy must be tabbed or separated as required by rule 3.1110(f)(3). 9 CHANDRA L. BAIRD, ) Department: 404 ) 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT 9 FAROOQ IMAM, ) Department: 403 9 ANNE DOLLARD, ) Department: 404 ) 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT It has no discretion. Iott v. Franklin(1988) 206 Cal.App.3d 521, 528. 5 Civic Center Courthouse Civic Center Courthouse 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT ) Quick Links 4 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT 9 IVAN D DAVCHEV, ) Department: 403 6 ROBERT ELLIOTT WHITEMAN, ) Case Number: FDV-22-816509 Central Court, 800 North Humboldt, San Mateo. ) 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: December 22, 2022 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER RE: RESPONDENT TO ENROLL PETIT 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO 5 ) Demurrer is sustained, in part, and overruled, in part. Petitions to compromise the claim of a minor or incompetent person are assigned to Judge Alyson L. Lewis in Department 34. ) 9 JOSE A MARTINEZ, ) Department: 403 Applications to Stay Evictionscan be filed at any court location that accepts civil filings: - Ren C. Davidson Courthouse (Oakland), and. ) 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM San Francisco Superior Court: Michael P. Candela Butte County Superior Court: Corie J. Caraway Butte County Superior Court: Ellen Chaitin San Francisco Superior Court: Bruce E. Chan San Francisco Superior Court: Roger C. Chan San Francisco Superior Court: Andrew Y.S. As such, any venue determinations are properly derived under that section of the CCP. 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER OF CHILD CUSTODY, VISITATION (P 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO Plaintiff filed a motion for OSC re Contempt and Sanctions on January 14, 2022, alleging in part that no supplemental responses had been served in violation of the Courts September 3, 2021 order. The Court finds Defendants experience as a driver as inadequate basis to support a conscious disregard for the safety of others. Plaintiff shall inform the preparing counsel of objections as to form, if any, or whether the form of order is approved, within five days of receipt of the proposed order. 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 5, 2023 Lang v. Hochman(2000) 77 Cal.App.4th 1225, 1248. ) 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER FOR CHANGE O 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT Updated Civil Calendar Click the link below to view an online (PDF) list of available Civil Law and Motion and Discovery Calendar hearing dates, updated weekly: Click for list of available dates ) ) 5 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT 11 ) 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER OF 1.TH 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 5, 2023 6 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, ) Case Number: FCS-22-355607 (1975) 15 Cal.3d 652, 657. San Francisco, CA 94102 9 MICHAEL PUENTE, ) Department: 403 In every case, to present a motion to the court, a party must: A party must give notice of the hearing as required by law. 9 LILLIAM L. SHYAM, ) Department: 404 ) 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER FOR CHANGE OF CHI 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM ) San Francisco, CA 94102 However, whenever a party files a petition under the California Arbitration Act (CAA), the court in which such petition was filed retains jurisdiction to determine any subsequent petition involving the same agreement to arbitrate and the same controversy, and any such subsequent petition shall be filed in the same proceeding. CCP 1292.6. 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: December 22, 2022 Print | E-mail Civil and Family Law Tentative Rulings Please refer to the notice entitled "Information Regarding Coronavirus (COVID-19) and Court Operations" on the court's home page for further detailed information. 9 JONATHAN TRAWINSKI, ) Department: 404 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER: MOTION TO VACATE AND E 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO ), A. Clerk's Office Appointments (Civil or Family), Child Custody, Guardianship and Domestic Violence Recommending Counseling, Pre-grants, Continuances, Drops, & Tentative Rulings, Archived General Orders Regarding COVID-19, Alameda - George E. McDonald Hall of Justice Livestreams, Dublin - East County Hall of Justice Livestreams, Oakland - Administration Building Livestreams, Oakland - Ren C. Davidson Courthouse Livestreams, Oakland - Wiley W. Manuel Courthouse Livestreams, San Leandro - Juvenile Justice Center Livestreams. Allen v. Sup.Ct. 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM ) ) 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT Plaintiffs have not shown argued or indicated that the objections present in the current motion are new, or were not asserted in the original discovery responses. 11 ) See also Mitchell v. Sup. CCP 2030.070 (a)-(b). ) ) 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER RE: ATTORNEY FEES AND C 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO 11 ) 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM 5 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 3, 2023 San Francisco, California 94102-3688. Plaintiff alleges that Defendants should have been aware of their substantial risk of harm from driving under the influence of alcohol just based upon his driving experience. He claims that Defendants negligently or intentionally disregarded signs of a stroke or other serious problem, either due to negligence or intentionally in order to avoid further treating Plaintiff because he was a recipient of Medi-Cal. Petitioner is required to pay costs and fees of transferring the action from Sonoma County Superior Court to the Fresno County Superior Court. 11 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Karston Industries, Inc. v. Sup. 9 GEORGE FAVVAS, ) Department: 403 ) 195.). Civil Code 3294 authorizes the recovery of punitive damages in noncontract cases where the defendant has been guilty of oppression, fraud, or malice Malice means conduct which is intended by the defendant to cause injury to the plaintiff or despicable conduct which is carried on by the defendant with a willful and conscious disregard of the rights or safety of others. 5 ) When a consumer has served such objections, the party seeking the information has the burden of moving the court to enforce the subpoena. Jerry's Shell v. Equilon Enterprises, LLC(2005) 134 Cal.App.4th 1058, 1073. Joseph Winer (Winer), in order to determine the validity of Plaintiffs claims that Joes condition warranted the requested accommodation. Plaintiff and SFPKOA met and conferred regarding Plaintiffs perceived insufficiencies of the responses. ) ) Code 3294. ) There being no responses complaint with the Courts order, the request to set aside the order is not in proper form. Law & Motion Calendars Informal Discovery Calendars Tentative Rulings Court Reporting Forms & Filing Local Forms Judicial Council Forms Self-Prep and File Fee Schedule Self-Help Being Your Own Lawyer About the SHC/FLF Divorce or Separation Child Custody & Parenting Child Support Abuse & Harassment Guardianship Conservatorship Landlord/Tenant 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM january 18, 2023 law and motion calendar page 9 judge: honorable marie s. weiner, department 2 _____ 2:00 21-udl-00401 are-san francisco no. 5 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: December 27, 2022 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT Experience. 6 NEHA DUA BREJA, ) Case Number: FDI-21-795427 ) 12 ) 10 Respondent ) Presiding: MARIA EVANGELISTA The protection is not absolute, however, and the information is discoverable where the need for discovery outweighs the privacy concerns. 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT Civil Law & Motion Tentative Rulings Effective January 1, 2021, San Mateo Superior Court is a direct calendar court for all Civil Matters. (Central Pathology Service Med. 10 Respondent ) Presiding: DANIEL FLORES G. Seventh, Eighth, and Tenth Causes of Action - Wage Loss, Loss of Earning Capacity, and Possible Diminution of Life Span, SRMH asserts the causes of action for Wage Loss, Loss of Earning Capacity, and Possible Diminution of Life Span should fail because they are not causes of action but rather damages. ) (CCP 452; Schifando v. City of Los Angeles (2003) 31 Cal.4th 1074, 1081. Importantly, the burden is on the moving party to show that venue is not proper in the county where the action was filed and that venue is proper in the county to which defendant wishes to transfer the action. apply to ex parte applications. 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 3, 2023 5 ) ) ) 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM 5 5 10 Respondent ) Presiding: DANIEL FLORES ) ) ) 9 EDGAR R GUZMAN, ) Department: 403 5 ) When an arbitration occurs in only one county, that county is the proper venue for motions to vacate the arbitration award. ) ) 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM 6 CHITRA AKILESWARAN, ) Case Number: FDI-20-793853 (415) 551-3759, Court Manager Ray & Bishop routinely pursues petitions for writ of administrative mandamus for our clients in California, gaining the insight and experience necessary to identify a favorable venue for a case. 5 You are using an outdated browser. ) 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER OF CHANGE OF CHILD C 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO Severe emotional distress [is] emotional distress of such substantial quantity or enduring quality that no reasonable man in a civilized society should be expected to endure it. (Fletcher v. Western Life Insurance Co. (1970) 10 Cal.App.3d 376, 397; see alsoCACI 1600.). (Code of Civil Procedure (CCP) 430.41.). ) 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: December 29, 2022 ) ) 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT Department 405 ) 10 Respondent ) Presiding: MARJORIE SLABACH 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 10, 2023 The court may take judicial notice of court records of this state. ) Plaintiff alleges eleven causes of action. ) 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT ) Superior Court of California - San Joaquin Civil Department 180 E Weber Ave., Suite 200 Stockton, CA 95202. ( Cal. The court agrees the seventh, eight, and tenth causes of action plead by Plaintiff are in fact damages and not causes of action. Accordingly, the demur to the third cause of action is OVERRULED. Excel Weather Formula, Fun Facts About Tea Etiquette, Articles S